Shakespeares dark lady - Amelia Bassano Lanier: the woman behind by the Shakespeares palys John Hudson ISBN 978 1-4456-2160-9
A thought provoking book on the theory that Amelia Bassano Lanier was the author of the plays of Shakespeare. I started off unconvinced but by the end, I was very open to the idea.
Unfortunately I am not enough of a scholar of Shakespeare and his/her plays to say whether the theory is sound. I would recommend everyone to read it.
Thursday, 29 May 2014
Opinion polls in Lib Dem held seats
Lord Oakeshott commissioned opinion polls in the constituencies of 5 Liberal Democrat MPs - it is alleged by Nick Clegg and other that he did this to deliberately damage the party.
That is utter nonsense. Lord Oakeshott was first asked by someone else to commission a poll in Vince Cable's constituency. This he did and it showed the Lib Dems in second place - worrying you would think as Mr Cable had a majority of 12,140 or 20% of the vote.
Most people - me included would have it in our list of dead cert Lib Dem holds at the next general election.
http://www.iaindale.com/posts/2014/02/05/why-the-libdem-seats-will-win-30-35-seats-in-2015
It can't be stressed strongly enough the opinion polls are opinions polls - if they had shown that the Lib Dems were set to romp home in Twickenham - then how on earth would that damage the party.
If on the other hand the polls showed the Lib Dems doing badly, they ought to act as a warning to the Lib Dems not to be complacent.
The weird reaction to the polls is unfortunate - because one only has to look at the local election results in Twickenham (part of the London Borough of Richmond) to know the Lib Dems are in trouble, and the polls confirm they apply to the parliamentary seat. Vince Cable was elected in 1997, if any Lib Dem is going to have an incumbency factor where years of hard work and high name recognition are going to help them keep a seat, it is surely someone like Vince Cable. As the Lib Dem general election strategy is based on such an approach, it is just as well to know now it is not likely to work.
That is utter nonsense. Lord Oakeshott was first asked by someone else to commission a poll in Vince Cable's constituency. This he did and it showed the Lib Dems in second place - worrying you would think as Mr Cable had a majority of 12,140 or 20% of the vote.
Most people - me included would have it in our list of dead cert Lib Dem holds at the next general election.
http://www.iaindale.com/posts/2014/02/05/why-the-libdem-seats-will-win-30-35-seats-in-2015
It can't be stressed strongly enough the opinion polls are opinions polls - if they had shown that the Lib Dems were set to romp home in Twickenham - then how on earth would that damage the party.
If on the other hand the polls showed the Lib Dems doing badly, they ought to act as a warning to the Lib Dems not to be complacent.
The weird reaction to the polls is unfortunate - because one only has to look at the local election results in Twickenham (part of the London Borough of Richmond) to know the Lib Dems are in trouble, and the polls confirm they apply to the parliamentary seat. Vince Cable was elected in 1997, if any Lib Dem is going to have an incumbency factor where years of hard work and high name recognition are going to help them keep a seat, it is surely someone like Vince Cable. As the Lib Dem general election strategy is based on such an approach, it is just as well to know now it is not likely to work.
Monday, 19 May 2014
The suffragettes in pictures
The suffragettes in pictures by Diane Atkinson.
An amazing book and quite traumatic to read.
The book is full of photos of the suffragettes - a fascinating insight into their campaign. The organisational achievements are truly impressive and the inventiveness of the campaign inspiring. the massive rallies before the use of public address systems and loud speakers is astonishing.
The text doesn't hold back from high lighting the splits that hit the movement and the change from militant tactics to arson attacks on houses, letter boxes and other places that served mainly to alienate support for the cause of votes for women. It is dreadful to think of the suffering endured by women who endured hunger strikes and force feeding often shortening their lives and giving them permanent injuries and health problems. More dreadful still to think of the apathy towards voting expressed by some women today.
It is quite melancholy feeling to see how they plainly had right on their side but were essentially unsuccessful in their aims until the first world war undermined most of the arguments against women suffrage and more importantly changed attitudes towards women.
The whole episode was a shameful chapter in the history of the Liberal Party - and Asquith in particular with his opposition to woman's suffrage caused immense long-term harm to the Liberal Party. In their defence - of perhaps which more in another post - it is often forgotten that plenty of men did not have the vote and the Liberals didn't have a majority in the House of Commons. let alone the House of Lords to secure votes for women. The political tactics of the suffragettes also seem somewhat counter productive - harassing Cabinet Ministers although understandable is perhaps poor psychology if you wish to win people over. Also supporting Conservatives in by-elections who opposed votes for women even if the Liberal candidate supported votes for women didn't make much political sense.
After votes for some women was achieved in 1918 - it seems people forgot what the fuss was about and it was soon extended to all women over 21 in 1928. The leading suffragettes all went separate ways - some like Emmeline Pankhurst became Conservative candidates for Parliament, some Labour some gave up politics, and some just suffered from ill health and went to an early grave.
An amazing book and quite traumatic to read.
The book is full of photos of the suffragettes - a fascinating insight into their campaign. The organisational achievements are truly impressive and the inventiveness of the campaign inspiring. the massive rallies before the use of public address systems and loud speakers is astonishing.
The text doesn't hold back from high lighting the splits that hit the movement and the change from militant tactics to arson attacks on houses, letter boxes and other places that served mainly to alienate support for the cause of votes for women. It is dreadful to think of the suffering endured by women who endured hunger strikes and force feeding often shortening their lives and giving them permanent injuries and health problems. More dreadful still to think of the apathy towards voting expressed by some women today.
It is quite melancholy feeling to see how they plainly had right on their side but were essentially unsuccessful in their aims until the first world war undermined most of the arguments against women suffrage and more importantly changed attitudes towards women.
The whole episode was a shameful chapter in the history of the Liberal Party - and Asquith in particular with his opposition to woman's suffrage caused immense long-term harm to the Liberal Party. In their defence - of perhaps which more in another post - it is often forgotten that plenty of men did not have the vote and the Liberals didn't have a majority in the House of Commons. let alone the House of Lords to secure votes for women. The political tactics of the suffragettes also seem somewhat counter productive - harassing Cabinet Ministers although understandable is perhaps poor psychology if you wish to win people over. Also supporting Conservatives in by-elections who opposed votes for women even if the Liberal candidate supported votes for women didn't make much political sense.
After votes for some women was achieved in 1918 - it seems people forgot what the fuss was about and it was soon extended to all women over 21 in 1928. The leading suffragettes all went separate ways - some like Emmeline Pankhurst became Conservative candidates for Parliament, some Labour some gave up politics, and some just suffered from ill health and went to an early grave.
I'm european, and british and english and human
One of the worst ever party political broadcasts (and there has been a lot of competition) is surely the mind numbingly awful English Democrats.
I've never had much truck with mindless nationalism and xenophobia - I love being English, I feel very privileged, but I don't imagine for one moment that I was offered a choice of nationalities before was born. I feel English, I feel British, I feel European and I feel like a citizen of the world.
The English Democrats do not - in fact so strongly do they feel that they are no European, not British but English, they keep repeating it in their 5 minute long party political broadcast.
Oddly, or rather typically for a party promoting mindless nationalism they seem to have very little idea about their country. There broadcast was full of unEnglish things they were proud of:
Boadicea - well, she rule a tribe in ancient Britain, in 61AD she led a revolt against Roman rulers. England was takes its name from the Angles one of the Germanic tribes who settled during the 5th and 6th centuries AD. England didn't become a state until 927 AD at the earliest and really only from the time of Edward the Confessor 100 years later. So Boadicea missed out on being English by, oooh, almost 1000 years !
The English Democrat song played in the background told us to be proud of England - from Lands End to Hadrian's Wall - ah yes, we ought to be proud of Hadrian Wall, built by the Romans and lets not mention the Cornish Nationalists while discussing Lands End.
The English Democrats love Nelson (British definitely, Britain was formed by the act of Union in 1707, Horatio Nelson was born in 1758 ) Winston Churchill (Half American) and Enoch Powell (who sat as an MP for North Ireland - which isn't in England)
And England is of course the land of Saint George (probably born to a Greek Christian noble family in Lydda in Palestine, between about 275 AD and 285 AD) who didn't become patron Saint of England till about 1350 and was largely forgotten by about 1800.
And they couldn't end the broadcast without mentioning that well known English City - Jerusalem !
All in all as bout as English as a kangaroo.
I've never had much truck with mindless nationalism and xenophobia - I love being English, I feel very privileged, but I don't imagine for one moment that I was offered a choice of nationalities before was born. I feel English, I feel British, I feel European and I feel like a citizen of the world.
The English Democrats do not - in fact so strongly do they feel that they are no European, not British but English, they keep repeating it in their 5 minute long party political broadcast.
Oddly, or rather typically for a party promoting mindless nationalism they seem to have very little idea about their country. There broadcast was full of unEnglish things they were proud of:
Boadicea - well, she rule a tribe in ancient Britain, in 61AD she led a revolt against Roman rulers. England was takes its name from the Angles one of the Germanic tribes who settled during the 5th and 6th centuries AD. England didn't become a state until 927 AD at the earliest and really only from the time of Edward the Confessor 100 years later. So Boadicea missed out on being English by, oooh, almost 1000 years !
The English Democrat song played in the background told us to be proud of England - from Lands End to Hadrian's Wall - ah yes, we ought to be proud of Hadrian Wall, built by the Romans and lets not mention the Cornish Nationalists while discussing Lands End.
The English Democrats love Nelson (British definitely, Britain was formed by the act of Union in 1707, Horatio Nelson was born in 1758 ) Winston Churchill (Half American) and Enoch Powell (who sat as an MP for North Ireland - which isn't in England)
And England is of course the land of Saint George (probably born to a Greek Christian noble family in Lydda in Palestine, between about 275 AD and 285 AD) who didn't become patron Saint of England till about 1350 and was largely forgotten by about 1800.
And they couldn't end the broadcast without mentioning that well known English City - Jerusalem !
All in all as bout as English as a kangaroo.
the best party political this year
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b04230nz/party-election-broadcasts-for-the-european-parliament-2014-alliance-party-28042014
Almost makes me want to live in Northern Ireland
Almost makes me want to live in Northern Ireland
Tuesday, 13 May 2014
the wooden horse
The film the wooden horse was show the other day.
It is quite amazing to think that the men who tunnelled out of a prisoner of war camp in the escape known as the "wooden horse" managed to tunnel 100 feet in three months. Only the shaft had wooden shoring meaning the rest of the tunnel carried a high risk of collapse. The three men who escaped made it back to re-join the war effort. It makes me wonder about their bravery and whether their return made any difference to the war.
It is quite amazing to think that the men who tunnelled out of a prisoner of war camp in the escape known as the "wooden horse" managed to tunnel 100 feet in three months. Only the shaft had wooden shoring meaning the rest of the tunnel carried a high risk of collapse. The three men who escaped made it back to re-join the war effort. It makes me wonder about their bravery and whether their return made any difference to the war.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)